The latest example of erratic behavior by the Department of Natural Resources is apparently a decision to delay an aerator permit for Albert Lea Lake.

Thursday, August 09, 2001

The latest example of erratic behavior by the Department of Natural Resources is apparently a decision to delay an aerator permit for Albert Lea Lake. Commissioners, who thought they were on the same page as the DNR, were puzzled Tuesday.

The reason given by the DNR: More community input is needed before the aerator is installed.

But the commissioners say they’ve been following the permit application process to the letter. If the county government is using official channels to effect change in the lake, why isn’t it allowed to proceed?

There is no consensus, nor will there likely ever be, on Albert Lea Lake’s use. Should we create conditions friendly to fish (and therefore, fishermen) – such as the extra oxygen provided by an aerator – or should we let nature take its course?

That’s something the community and local government need to decide, not the DNR. If the county is following the rules in applying for the permit, there’s no reason for delay. An aerator does not create any irreversible change in the lake; if it’s decided that aeration runs counter to the community’s vision for the lake, it can be removed.

Until then, however, it’s time to get the aerator permit approved.