Editorial: Funding for Guthrie Theater went too far

Published 12:00 am Tuesday, June 10, 2003

It was clear that when legislators finally approved this year’s bonding bill, not everyone was going to be pleased.

Still, it’s easy to question the $25 million allocated for the Guthrie Theater.

It’s hard to find someone to say the Minneapolis theater isn’t an asset to this state. It recently garnered a national honor as a top regional theater in the country, so there’s no question they’re providing a great cultural service.

Email newsletter signup

Since its opening 40 years ago, the Guthrie has delighted residents throughout the Upper Midwest and has been a source of pride for all Minnesotans.

Unfortunately, tough economic times dictate that legislators prioitize when it comes to any type of state-related funding. That’s why the enormous amount given to the theater could have been better spent on other projects statewide.

Some legislators have defended funding the theater, saying that just because the state’s in a money crunch, it doesn’t mean we should turn a blind eye toward the arts. There’s some merit in that.

However, why should many more Minnesota residents have to suffer through the lack of services and opportunities that would have been offered to them? College students are facing staggering tuition hikes because funding has been slashed. Plus, about $25 million was taken away from an original request for the Department of Natural Resources for various projects that would have helped beautify one our state’s biggest assets &045; its outdoors. And the list doesn’t end there.

Funding for the Guthrie should have either been given in smaller chunks, or put on hold for another year. Unfortunately, projects that would have ultimately benefited more residents than theatergoers aren’t getting the funding they need.