Bonding proposal is fiscally responsible

Published 9:00 am Sunday, May 22, 2016

Capitol Comments by Peggy Bennett

We have just hours left of the legislative session, and we’re moving closer to passing legislation that will shape the future of our state. One of the big bills under consideration is the House bonding proposal of $800 million. In this language, we focused on the “nuts and bolts” — critical projects Minnesotans need. Despite House Democrats voting against the bill, I’m continuing to fight for projects to benefit our area, and the state as a whole.

Peggy Bennett

Peggy Bennett

Our bill includes $227 million for local road and bridge projects, $130 million for water infrastructure and $137 million for higher education. When putting this legislation together — which includes many projects from both sides of the aisle — we attempted to prioritize projects according to the greatest need as opposed to wants. Our House proposal funds essential initiatives without jeopardizing our future with excess borrowing.

Email newsletter signup

Of the over $3 billion of bonding requests this biennium, many projects didn’t make the final bill. I am thankful that two of my bills were included in the House language. The first portion allocates $7.5 million to Riverland Community College to renovate and reorganize the transportation and industrial education center. Riverland is an incredible resource, and this funding would offer increased trade training for local students, as well as potentially provide more needed workforce for our area.

The House proposal also includes funds that would help Albert Lea’s Stables area improve their sewer system. Based on a priority list set by the Public Facilities Authority, this project would receive funding from the $70 million we have dedicated in the Water Infrastructure Fund. We need to help the Stables neighborhood of Albert Lea address this longtime need in upgrading their sewer system. It would be a costly fix for the city and residents, and is a perfect opportunity for the state to assist our residents.

As a whole, our plan helps Minnesotans while ensuring we don’t live outside the state’s means. It’s a fiscally responsible proposal that provides the greatest good for our residents and our state. Despite not receiving a super majority of votes on Thursday, I’ll continue to advocate for our local projects to be included in any final agreement, and hope we can come to a compromise on bonding to benefit Minnesotans.

 

Rep. Peggy Bennett, R-Albert Lea, is the District 27A representative.