House passes budget that cuts health care program for low-income
Published 9:51 am Wednesday, April 29, 2015
ST. PAUL — House Republicans put a health care program for tens of thousands of low-income Minnesotans on the chopping block as the centerpiece of a budget bill that aims to put up half of the $2 billion in tax relief GOP lawmakers hope to offer.
After a debate that stretched from Tuesday afternoon into this morning, the GOP-controlled House passed a bill that funds Minnesota’s health and human services department, the largest slice of the state’s $40 billion budget, but eliminates the MinnesotaCare program. The measure passed 72-60, with all Democrats voting against it.
The bill’s passage sets up a wide gulf with the Democrat-controlled Senate, where top lawmakers say going after MinnesotaCare, a program created in 1992 for residents who make too much money to qualify for Medical Assistance, when the state has a hefty budget surplus is unthinkable. It has sparked memories of 2005, when a GOP-led effort to tighten MinnesotaCare enrollment was a large factor in a government shutdown.
With changes that weed out ineligible enrollees from the state’s public programs and cutting administrative expenses at the Department of Human Services, the Republicans who control the House aim to make more than $1 billion in cuts to a sector of state government they say is spending too much money, too fast.
“The ship we’re on is heading for a waterfall,” said Rep. Matt Dean, chairman of the House committee that handles health care spending. “I think you know it, we know it, Gov. Dayton knows it.”
But the biggest savings, more than $500 million, come from axing MinnesotaCare. In its place, the GOP budget would offer a state-based tax credit to buy down private coverage as roughly 90,000 enrollees move to the health insurance marketplace starting next year.
“We all realize that there’s going to be change, and change is scary sometimes,” Dean said before the House took up his bill. “So if we’re trying to be serious about helping low-income Minnesotans be able to afford health insurance, that’s what we’re talking about.”
House Democrats said the bill would put the state’s budget in peril — it banks on saving $300 million by auditing the state’s public programs to remove ineligible enrollees, but a fiscal estimate from nonpartisan budget staff released Tuesday pegs the savings at just $16.5 million.
“Right now you have a $285 million hole in your budget,” Minority Leader Paul Thissen said, arguing the measure should be delayed and reworked.
Dean and other Republicans dismissed the administration’s fiscal note as “phony,” pointing to a legislative audit suggesting larger signs of fraud within public health and economic support networks.
“We need to be aggressive and we need to be able to get these savings,” Dean said.
Sen. Tony Lourey, Dean’s counterpart in the Senate, sounded a note of caution to House Republicans last week on how they could nail down an agreement while trying to do away with MinnesotaCare — a nonstarter with his caucus and Gov. Mark Dayton.
“We’ll have to have them get serious about their entire budget,” he said. “The manner in which they’re disrupting how Minnesotans get their health care is a very dangerous approach.”
A group of about 20 protesters gathered outside the House chambers to call on lawmaker to keep MinnesotaCare in place. Even with additional tax credits, enrollees would likely face much higher out-of-pocket costs, said Liz Doyle with TakeAction Minnesota, a coalition of unions and advocacy groups.
Dean criticized Democrats for drawing the line on maintaining MinnesotaCare.
“I think that’s short-sighted, because they’ve also admitted that they can’t pay for what we currently have,” the Dellwood Republican said. “We need some stability and predictability in Minnesota’s health care market. That’s the discussion that we’re starting today, and it’s one that’s long overdue.”